Reports & compliance
Struxiva turns the same validated building data behind fault detection and forecasting into the exact statutory, board-standard and client-facing reports property managers, owners, energy companies and developers already have to produce, auto-populated wherever the data allows, clearly flagged wherever it doesn't.
Isännöinti · Public sector · Commercial & institutional · Healthcare & education · Energy & ESCOs · Construction & development
For isännöinti & housing companies
Everything a property manager already has to produce for the board, an owner, or a buyer at the point of sale, mapped field by field to Struxiva's data, sorted mandatory first.
Auto-compiles the mandatory energy and consumption disclosure, heating, water, electricity, year-over-year change, that this report must include under AOYL 10:5.
Forecasts the 5-year repair and maintenance outlook every board must present at the annual meeting under AOYL 6:3, grounded in real condition data instead of guesswork.
Sharper, evidence-backed condition and maintenance disclosures for every apartment sale or refinancing, reducing your liability on every transaction.
Feeds the certificate calculation directly from validated building data, ready for an accredited assessor to issue, valid up to 10 years.
Confirms and documents charging-readiness obligations under Laki 733/2020 for any building with more than four parking spaces.
Building-data sections of the annual accounts, plus a monthly board pack drafted automatically between meetings.
Continuously updated input for the board-standard condition survey and 10-year cost plan, instead of a static study that's out of date within a year.
Baseline, phased renovation plan and cost/savings projection ready ahead of Finland's EPBD-recast transposition deadline (29 May 2026).
Gets ahead of the residential building-automation requirement trending toward 2030, before it becomes mandatory.
Ranks every building in your portfolio by EUI and cost per m², then proves the savings from each fix against a clean, weather-normalized baseline, your own sales tool with clients.
Korjausvelka (repair debt), kuntoluokka (condition class, K1–K5), sisäilmastoluokitus (indoor climate classification) and other recognized reference points, calculated automatically for every board decision.
Five indices no one else offers: a live repair-debt index, a special-charge risk score (lisälasku, surprise assessment), a digital-readiness score, a portfolio-wide renovation urgency ranking, and a savings-confidence grade.
For municipalities & public portfolios
Compliance reporting is rising fast under EPBD, EED and Finland's new low-carbon construction rules, mapped field by field to Struxiva's data across the whole portfolio, sorted mandatory first.
Embodied-carbon calculation and material inventory for every qualifying new building, live since Rakentamislaki §38 took effect on 1 January 2026.
Compiles the full Motiva-format energy audit, consumption, systems assessment, proposed measures and profitability, building by building.
Tracks cumulative consumption reduction against the 1.9%-a-year target and renovated floor area against the 3%-a-year target under the EED, continuously, not once a year.
Existing infrastructure inventory, aggregated demand and waste-heat-recovery potential for the municipal heating-and-cooling-plan obligation (population >45,000).
Prior-year consumption, measures and savings impact under the Julkisen alan energiatehokkuussopimus, ready for submission through the Motiva reporting system.
Feeds the buildings-sector emissions inventory and E-luku tracking behind the city's own recurring annual climate progress report.
Roof-by-roof PV feasibility, structural load and shading analysis across the whole portfolio, ahead of the EPBD Article 10 solar mandate.
Tracks solar (>500m²) and EV pre-cabling (>5 spaces) obligations together across every qualifying building, effective 2027/2029.
Turns portfolio condition and consumption data into a phased, costed renovation roadmap aligned to the national long-term strategy, pending the Finnish national registry.
Function inventory and gap analysis ready for the building-automation requirement, while it's still in draft and thresholds are still moving.
Consolidated and entity-level reporting views across every subsidiary and sector agreement a city portfolio touches.
Portfolio-scale korjausvelka (repair debt), EU Taxonomy climate-risk scoring, and direct integration with Helsinki's own Ilmastovahti tracking tool.
A whole-life carbon score, a portfolio investment-prioritization ranking across 60,000+ municipal buildings, and an early-warning indoor-climate index for schools and daycares.
For commercial & institutional owners
The reporting your board, your investors and Brussels now expect, mapped field by field to Struxiva's validated portfolio data, sorted mandatory first.
Compiles the environmental data points, energy performance, emissions, technical screening criteria, your sustainability report and Taxonomy-alignment disclosure require, building by building.
Tracks every asset against the EPBD's 2030/2033 worst-performer thresholds, flagging which buildings need action first and by when.
Feeds the certificate calculation from validated building data for every asset in the portfolio, ready for an accredited assessor to issue.
Condition, defects, energy performance and U-values for a target asset, assembled from source data instead of a seller's summary, before you sign.
Ranks every asset by EUI and cost per m², so capital goes to the buildings where it saves the most.
Maps existing building data against certification criteria, showing you the gap before you commission a costly external assessment.
Ranks candidate retrofit measures by payback and ROI, then verifies realized savings against a clean, weather-normalized baseline, your evidence for investors and lenders.
Calculated automatically from installed equipment and controls, a forward-looking signal for investors and tenants alike.
EU Taxonomy technical screening criteria, GRESB-aligned data points and EPBD compliance status, calculated automatically for every board or investor update.
A portfolio investment-prioritization ranking, a retrofit ROI index, a Taxonomy-alignment gap score, and a savings-confidence grade for every completed retrofit.
For healthcare & education real estate
Air quality, comfort and continuous-operation requirements come with their own reporting burden, mapped field by field to Struxiva's data, sorted mandatory first.
Classifies every space against the recognized indoor-climate categories, the reference point Finnish hospitals and schools are judged against.
Calculates predicted mean vote and percentage dissatisfied from air temperature, radiant temperature, humidity and air velocity, evidence for a facilities board or health authority.
Continuous compliance tracking against recognized indoor-air-quality bands wherever CO₂ sensors exist, catching a ventilation problem before it becomes a health complaint.
Derives ventilation performance from CO₂-decay analysis, evidence of adequate fresh-air supply without a one-off blower-door test.
Feeds the certificate calculation from validated data, ready for an accredited assessor, even across a complex, layered-renovation facility.
Flags conditions linked to mould and moisture damage, a leading cause of Finnish sisäilma complaints, before they surface in a health inspection.
Locates defects and degradation precisely enough to plan work around continuous care or teaching, no guessing which zone to close.
ASHRAE 62.1 ventilation rates, ISO 7730 comfort criteria and EN 16798-1 compliance bands, calculated automatically for every facilities report.
A sisäilma early-warning index flagging at-risk spaces before symptoms are reported, and a continuous-operation renovation-sequencing score.
For energy companies & ESCOs
Performance contracts, energy audits and smart-upgrade proposals all rest on data your client can trust, mapped field by field to a validated dataset, sorted by what closes deals fastest.
Verifies realized savings against a clean, weather-normalized baseline using IPMVP-consistent methods, so a disputed number never costs you a renewal.
Establishes and documents the pre-retrofit baseline your contract's savings guarantee is measured against, before you make a single promise.
Compiles the full Motiva-format energy audit, consumption, systems assessment, proposed measures and profitability, building by building, at a fraction of the manual survey time.
Ranks every candidate retrofit measure by payback and ROI, a ready-made proposal instead of a raw spreadsheet.
Calculated automatically from installed equipment and controls, evidence when you pitch a smart-upgrade package a client hasn't asked for yet.
Pinpoints exactly where and why a building is wasting energy, the finding your proposal is built around.
ASHRAE Guideline 14 measurement-and-verification practice and IPMVP Options A–D, applied consistently across every client engagement.
A savings-confidence grade for every completed measure, and a portfolio-wide retrofit-priority ranking you can hand straight to a client's board.
For construction & development
The models, defect lists and warranty records you already assemble at handover, turned into a dataset the owner actually keeps using, sorted by what protects you longest.
Delivers a validated, unified BIM/IFC-based dataset at handover, not a folder of disconnected models the owner never opens again.
Documents and precisely locates every defect identified before and during handover, a clear record if a dispute ever surfaces.
Tracks issues raised during the warranty window against the validated as-built dataset, so liability is based on evidence, not memory.
Unifies fragmented, incompatible-format data from every trade into one coherent building record.
Builds accurate 3D geometry directly from dimensions in technical drawings, closing gaps in an incomplete or inconsistent model set.
Documents building-automation readiness ahead of tightening EU requirements, evidence for the client, not just a compliance checkbox.
Exposes the validated graph via API to the owner's BMS, CAFM or ERP system, a differentiator over a competing bid.
IFC/BIM data-quality and coverage scoring, calculated automatically for every handover package.
A digital-twin readiness score and a warranty-risk index, benchmarked across every project you hand over.
The report count reflects every report card on this page. Field-level coverage (data fields mapped, % auto-populated) has been verified for the isännöinti and municipal segments only; the commercial, healthcare, ESCO and construction segments need the same field-by-field mapping exercise before a combined, six-segment figure can be published here. The remainder in every segment is manual, organizational or external input that Struxiva flags rather than guesses.